Department of Biological Sciences header
 
   
 

CCSU Graduate Research & Creative Presentation Day, May 14, 2003
 

MAPPING THE MINOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY MARKER H-HIXC ON THE MOUSE X CHROMOSOME

Emily Taylor and Kristi Lamonica
Department of Biological Sciences, Central Connecticut State University

Minor histocompatibility (H) antigens are typically identified as barriers to transplantation in graft exchange experiments between major histocompatibility complex (H2)-matched hosts. Alner et al. have recently shown that a barrier to histocompatibility is encoded on the X Chromosome in strain B mice (XB) that strain C’s X chromosome (XC) has lost. Alner also showed that this H barrier is comprised of a minimum of two XB-encoded antigens, since two different antigen-presenting molecules, H2B and H2C, must be carried by the host for graft rejection to occur.

To restrict the locations(s) of these H-hixc-encoded, loss-of-antigen alleles, a trihybrid cross, (C x B.C-H2c)F1 x B was performed. The F1 females carried XB and XC, and were homozygous for H2c (which is the only C-derived locus carried by the “congenic” strain, B.C-H2c). When these F1 females were crossed to strain B males, all the “N2-like” progeny must be H2b/c heterozygotes, giving these males the potential to be good rejecters of H-hixb-bearing grafts—if they have also inherited the complete H-hixc haplotype from their F1 mother. All N2-like males were grafted with (B x B.C)F1, H-hixb-bearing skin to determine which carried the H-hixc component(s) necessary for graft rejection. DNA was isolated by tail-tip biopsy from all rejecter N2-like males and typed using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for 12 DNA markers on the X chromosome to limit the possible location(s) of C-derived sequences that might include H-hixc.

At the same time, female N2-like mice were also grafted with (B x B.C)F1 skin, to control for the purity of our inbred mouse strains. Unfortunately, some of these females aggressively rejected their control grafts, suggesting that our starting strains were not pure. This unexpected H barrier segregated within only certain families in our N2-like panel, and we have now hypothesized that the B.C-H2c strain may no longer be identical with the B strain, due to random genetic change (i.e., a spontaneous minor histocompatibility mutation) since the original derivation of the B and B.C congenic lines.

We are responding to this problem in two ways:

1) We have eliminated from our N2-like panel of rejecter males any with a sister sib that rejected a control graft (since such rejecter males might carry either the requisite H-hixc haplotype on their X or because they (or their graft) may have carried the “new” spontaneous mutation). This restricted data set may allow us to draw at least tentative conclusions about the possible location(s) of <>H-hixc.

2) We have begun to re-derive the B.C-H2c strain by repeated backcrossing to strain B, so that any contaminating mutation can be lost by independent assortment while we select for the retention of H2c. We expect that this protocol will eliminate the confounding new H barrier, and allow a second attempt at mapping H-hixc components using the trihybrid, N2-like cross to begin in a few months time.


Copyright © 2004 [Central Connecticut State University]. All rights reserved.
Questions/Comments: Tiffany Doan at DoanTiM@ccsu.edu

Last Modified: Wednesday, 31. October 2007